LACK OF A GOOD SCORECARD = AVOIDANCE OF ACCOUNTABILITY

The following blog by my friend, Mark O’Donnell, is one of the best on the subject of why we need rock-solid scorecards.  It begs the question: If our scorecard is not great, is it because we are avoiding the accountability that comes with a great scorecard?  In my 18 years of experience helping companies grow, even the +$100m companies often have weak scorecards.  Developing a good scorecard takes time – often many months.  Not having an effective scorecard is like being handed a map and told, “Go to Atlanta!”  BUT – if you don’t know where you are on the map,  how the heck……..? 

LACK OF A GOOD SCORECARD = AVOIDANCE OF ACCOUNTABILITY
By Mark O’Donnell
July 2, 2020

Peter Drucker once said, “what gets measured, gets managed.” I’m beginning to understand the true meaning of his words as I work with my clients and businesses I own.

In strengthening the Six Key Components of a business, the Data Component is often the last to get attention.

A good Scorecard is the key to accountability. I began asking why this was and the answer became so obvious, I have to admit I was a little embarrassed that it took me so long to get it.

A SCORECARD IS KEY IN ANY BUSINESS OPERATING SYSTEM

In EOS®, the Data Component consists of two tools. The first is the Scorecard and the second is Measurables.

The Scorecard is a set of activity-based numbers that let you know how a business or department is performing. So why is it that managers and leaders shy away from developing a meaningful scorecard?

WHAT GETS MEASURED, GETS MANAGED

Accountability is a funny thing.

The avoidance of accountability is like electricity and water. It flows toward the path of least resistance. So, we make excuses on why we can get good data. All sorts of excuses, like our accounting categories are wrong or our CRM data isn’t updated.

The reality is that we find all kinds of excuses to avoid accountability that a Scorecard shines a spotlight on.

So, what should be in a Scorecard?

A great Scorecard should contain 5-15 activity-based indicators that you review every week. The numbers should be leading indicators that help you keep an absolute pulse on the business or project. Relying on business applications, like QuickBooks for Scorecard information is inadequate. By the time information on revenue and costs are available, it may be too late to make a meaningful decision. Data needs to be as real-time as possible or, even better, leading indicators of future performance.

Some great leading indicators, for any business, would be sales-related activities. A good example would be the number of meetings with potential clients or the number of emails sent.

From an operational perspective, it could be the number of errors made during a process or project delivery. In professional services firms, utilization can be the best indicator of financial performance. Although a lagging indicator, timesheet data, entered daily, will be as close to real-time as you can get. These are just some simple examples of good Scorecard numbers. Yet, people avoid them to escape accountability and not for their complexity.

In the end, if you think you have an accountability problem, take a look at your scorecard. Does it give you a weekly pulse on your business or project? Are you avoiding it and making it complex to avoid accountability?

Reference: EOS Worldwide

Contact me if you’d like help creating or tuning-up your scorecard.

The post LACK OF A GOOD SCORECARD = AVOIDANCE OF ACCOUNTABILITY appeared first on EOS Implementer™ - Wayne Kurzen.

← Previous Post Next Post →